![analytics awstats analytics awstats](https://wp-root.org/wp-content/gf-uploads/2015/12/awstats_02.png)
AWStats constructs visits from a combination of hits in the server logs from their IP address, so they don't follow a user who visits from multiple. AWstats will still continue to run because it's an application running locally on the web server, analyzing the local logs. AWStats uses analyzed server logs, and they include crawlers and bots, as well as end users with JavaScript disabled and Google Analytics opt-out users, none of which Google Analytics measures.
#Analytics awstats install#
It's therefore likely that more and more (advanced, still) Internet users will adapt the security and install non-tracking tools which will mess up the centralized website statistics at Google Analytics. The meaning of data privacy came into more and more minds this year after information about the NSA spying scandal was released. Which websites was the user visiting today? What did he buy? Was he watching porn? It's an automatic spy following you every step through the day. As Google is operating worldwide and has Analytics on hundreds of thousands of websites, a very complete profile of a website visitor can be created. AWStats uses analyzed server logs, and they include crawlers and bots, as well as end users with JavaScript disabled and. AWStats and Webalizer can give you rough data on how much traffic you get and which pages are the most popular, while Google Analytics pulls all this together.
#Analytics awstats how to#
If Google really knows how to separate the fake from real visitors somehow, this would make sense for lower visitor numbers.Īlthough Google Analytics might have some very advanced algorithms which could separate fake from real visitors, not all website visitors wish to be analyzed and tracked through the Internet. Maybe Google has found a way to identify these fake visits (by maintaining a database containing known IP addresses of such bots?).
![analytics awstats analytics awstats](https://geekmps.fr/images/google/piwik/piwik-AWstats-remplace-google-analytics-geekmps-002.jpg)
As long as there is no "bot" or "spider" or similar word appearing in the User-Agent header, AWstats counts these visits as real visitors. Many hacking bots claim to be an Internet Explorer browser by faking the User-Agent header. AWStats and Webalizer are more to do with website and server performance/network and bandwidth usage and optimization. When I compared both statistics outputs, I got aware that there was a mismatch of the used browsers of the website visitors. Therefore these visitors do not appear in the stats of Google Analytics. It's quite possible that some (advanced) Internet users make use of such an add-on.
#Analytics awstats code#
NO Google Analytics for Firefox), which actively prevent GoogleAnalytics code to be executed in the browser. There are browser add-ons available (e.g. If JavaScript is disabled in the browser, the code will not be launched and therefore Google Analytics is missing out on that visitor. The Google Analytics code is embedded in the website as a JavaScript code snipped. The first method, logfile analysis (used by AwStats), reads the logfiles in. However this is a security measure to not execute code in the browser. There are two main technological approaches to collecting web analytics data. In the era of modern web sites this can cause a website to look catastrophic, agreed. Note that these are only assumptions.īrowsers have the possibility to block all JavaScript scripts. There could be several reasons for that massive difference. The very same for November with an even bigger difference: To my big surprise, the collected data for page view/page impressions are not that far off: The difference is massive, especially for the visit statistics.